/

Systemic Risk Relevance of Pension Funds, Insurers and Asset Managers


This presentation contrasts typical industry perspectives on (financial) systemic risk with typical (systemic risk) regulator perspectives, particularly for those parts of the financial community such as insurers, pension funds and asset managers who may argue that systemic risk is exclusively a banking phenomenon.

[as pdf]

Slides
1Systemic Risk Relevance of Pension Funds, Insurers and Asset Managers
2Agenda
3Agenda
4Introduction
5And possible spill-overs to sovereign risk
6Sovereign risk: a longer term perspective
7New regulatory structures and responsibilities
8On macro-prudential policy Haldane (2014) notes
9Systemic risk not seen as just about banks
10Relative sizes
11Systemically important institutions
12Banks
13Insurers
14Agenda
15Typical insurer and pension fund perspectives
16Typical asset manager perspectives
17Other industry perspectives
18Consequence of decision to have some insurer G-SIFIs
19Agenda
20Typical (systemic risk) regulator perspectives (1)
21Typical (systemic risk) regulator perspectives (2)
22Agenda
23Who is correct?
24Interconnectivity doesn’t have to be direct to matter
25The capital waterfall: subordination, tiering and tranching
26Insights from balance sheet analogy (1)
27Insights from balance sheet analogy (2)
28Pension funds and financial stability
29Summary
30Important Information



NAVIGATION LINKS
Contents | Next | Library


Desktop view | Switch to Mobile