Nematrian
/

Basel III versus Solvency II [14]

Go to: Summary | Previous | Next   
Bullet points include: Both Basel III and Solvency II have risk-based approaches Which means: Some components are (conceptually) similar Because some types of risk apply to both business types Some components are (conceptually) different Because some types of risk largely or wholly apply only to one business type Banks and insurers both come in many different varieties Both sets of frameworks are sizeable To some extent compete for regulatory and legislative air-time In some cases draw from each other, in other cases are less compatible

NAVIGATION LINKS
Contents | Prev | Next | Library

Desktop view | Switch to Mobile