/

Solar-powered space flight

7b. Achieving the desired level of optical precision: Mathematical analysis

[this page | pdf | references | back links]

Return to Abstract and Contents

Next page

 

7.4          We analyse further point (d) as follows. Assume that the mirror is rotating around its axis of symmetry (the x-axis) with an angular speed  and the mirror is described as a surface using cylindrical polar coordinates  where , .

 

We first consider the situation where there are many stanchions suitably positioned so that each part of the mirror is subject to a force from them per unit mirror area (cross-sectional area perpendicular to the x-axis) of . We assume initially that these forces are continuously distributed, although of course in practice there would be a finite (albeit possibly quite large) number of stanchions, so we would merely have a discrete approximation to this continuous ideal. Assume that the corresponding tensions within the mirror (per unit cross-sectional area) are  in the plane of the mirror, see Figure 12.

 

Figure 12. Forces on a small part of the larger mirror

 

In the absence of thrust, the vehicle would be in free-fall. If in addition  and  then there would be no tension within the mirror and it would be completely floppy. If we assume as above that the vehicle ejects propellant along the positive x-axis and if we arrange for  then all of the forces on the mirror are rotationally symmetric. We could in principle have the mirror made up of several concentric annuli with transmission mechanisms between them that allow different annuli to rotate at different speeds, but this would add complexity and mass to the overall arrangement, so we assume that  is constant for all  although not necessarily constant for all . The equations of motion satisfied by the mirror therefore become:

 

 

We first note that ideally we would have constant ratios between , ,  and  for all  (and hence we would have the angle, , that each stanchion would make to the x-axis, were there to be merely one stanchion for each mirror element, also independent of ). This can be achieved by keeping  proportional to , i.e.  constant, perhaps by ejecting a small proportion of the propellant in a manner (e.g. in the  direction) that creates a torque, that when transmitted to the mirror increases or reduces its rotational speed.

 

We next note that it is possible to come up with plausible arrangements that do potentially keep the mirror tensioned in the manner indicated above. Reverting to the iterative notation used previously, focusing on the part of the mirror where  is positive (and starting at 1), and scaling the overall mirror size so that its overall radius is  we have:

 

 

where:

 

 


NAVIGATION LINKS
Contents | Prev | Next


Desktop view | Switch to Mobile